A few readers have asked whether an LLP or an LLLP is the better choice for holding and renting property. Limited Liability Partnership versus Limited Liability Limited Partnership. I am no expert on the differentiation.
We chose LLPs. Our reasoning at the time was that we were trying to provide liability protection for the partners (in this case a couple) as a group rather than protection for the "limited liability partner" from actions of the "general partner". We wanted both partners to be involved and agreeing on partnership decisions, rather than one partner managing the activities and the other being a silent investor.
Here is a site that discusses the options: http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/encyclopedia/Oli-Per/Partnerships.html#b
Any experts out there that can comment?
Monday, January 9, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
After reading the link you posted, it seems that by using an LLP, you have protected yourself from any malpractice suits against your wife and your wife has been protected against any malpractice suits against you. However, you are both still liable personally for anything you do. I don't really see any advantage of using an LLP over buying the property personally.
ReplyDeleteIn most cases, LLP is the best for a couple as you stated. LLLP is better for partners that don't have legal right to each others assets. However, there are other situational factors to consider that could change the optimal structure, such as marital status, state laws, and how much of the time the property will be rented.
ReplyDeleteThe benefit of using an LLP or LLLP over buying it personally is to avoid double taxation.
Jeff Galloway
jgalloway@southboundconsulting.ca
www.southboundconsulting.ca